I and all the things I stand for are under attack


I am under attack. I and all the things I stand for are under attack. Im Tirtzu has launched a campaign against the New Israel Fund, blaming it for the Goldstone report. “Without NIF, there would be no Goldstone report” they are claiming. Which is to say, without the Jews who support the New Israel Fund, there would be no Goldstone. Without Jews who believe in inalienable rights to safety and security, there would be no Goldstone. Without it’s staff and volunteers, there would be no Goldstone. Without you, KFJ, there would be no Goldstone. Without human rights values, there would be no Goldstone. Without the values you believe are most important in the world, KFJ, there wouldn’t be a Goldstone report.

Organizations in Israel rightly see this attack as against not just NIF, but all human rights orgs. And we progressives  (rightly so!) see it as an attack on us, on human rights as a value to even begin with. The New Israel Fund is a pride and joy of my involvement with the organized Jewish community. There is no other place in Jewry where my peoplehood, my values, and my talents overlap as they do here.

Truth is, I came to Israel advocacy by accident! I went to Israel as a naive 21-year-old because I felt obligated to my people. After I saw the occupation, I got  involved not because the country did anything but horrify me, but because my God told me to fix a problem. Even if there weren’t an ethnic conflict between two peoples, there would still be enough economic injustice there to last a lifetime of fixing. And at my resistance, but God’s insistence, I pledged my every talent to fix it. For as long as it takes.

The State of Israel defied everything I expected it to be. Righteous indignation fueled my work. Until I met Israeli human rights activists, under the auspices of the New Israel Fund. Mizrachim, Ethiopians and Bedouin, and plenty Ashkenazim who leave their privilege behind to take up their neighbors’ fights. Soldiers who weather taunts of “traitor.” Lawyers who forsake the good life for the good fight. Again reluctantly, I fell in love with a quality of their spirit that I can only label as “Israeli.” There is an innocent chutzpah in their own righteous indignation that I find aggravatingly charming. I’m in awe of all of them for bold-headedly creating what we take for granted in America: civil rights legislation, public interest law, grassroots advocacy in myraid sub-fields of social justice.

By day I work in Israel education. By night I lead in progressive Israel advocacy. By the midnight lamp, I blog the excess energies about (yes) saving Israel. Some nights I am not sure what I’m saving — a state? A people? A nationality? Principles? Jewish values? My own conscience? But I never forget who I’m doing it for: not myself, and not even Israelis at large. I’m working myself day and night to preserve something I’m not totally convinced is worthy. I work to save not Israel abstractly, but the incredible souls who are her human, civil and social rights activists that I have met through the New Israel Fund.

And now — with the blessing of the government, the military brass, and Christian Zionists — Israel will say to me that Israeli society doesn’t believe in human rights? That human rights are a threat to Israel? That I and everything I stand for are traitors?


Public Committee Against Torture in Israel: Report on IDF changes in policy during Gaza operation


The Public Committee Against Torture in Israel released a report “No Second Thoughts: Changes in the IDF’s Combat Doctrine In Light of Operation Cast Lead.” The report explains how the IDF’s shift of priority from minimizing civilian casualties to minimizing IDF casualties constitutes deliberate harm to civilians and civilian infrastructure — in violation of international laws.


no second thoughts_ENG_WEB -

Hat tip to Mondoweiss for uploading the report.


B’Tselem’s animated short on why Israel’s Gaza seige strengthens Hamas


Pretty straight forward to me.

And take a look at the real tunnels via cameras B’Tselem gave to Gazan youth to document their lives.


Obama left peace out of the State of the Union, but he talked about it today


Obama addressed a question about Middle East peace at a town hall in Tampa, Florida, today (emphases mine). Transcript courtesy of the Jewish liaison from the office of the Vice President, whom I met in DC and who always sends me Presidential quotations she thinks I want to hear.

In a marked difference from the Bush years, I appreciate the President highlighting the intransigence of the Israeli government presently. He was delicate and fair to both sides, but I’m happy to see the President not place the blame entirely on the Palestinians.

However, it irks me to see the reiteration of “As a first step, the Palestinians have to unequivocally renounce violence and recognize Israel.” The PLO already has renounced violence and recognized Israel, during the Olso Accords, in every treaty to date, and most recently at the 2009 Fatah party convention; it is Hamas that Obama rightly notes has done neither. It is something that is said for ignorant Jews who think we still live in 2001. And you’ll notice no reciprocal applause after Obama says Israel must “acknowledge legitimate grievances and interests of the Palestinians.”

This is why I’m a local leader in J Street NYC — which launches next Thursday, Feb 4th at the Prince George Ballroom (15 West 27th Street, NYC) and where we’ll plug people immediately into projects that advance grassroots pro-peace power in New York. RSVP here!

AUDIENCE MEMBER:    My question is, last night in your State of the Union address you spoke of America’s support for human rights.  Then why have we not condemned Israel and Egypt’s human rights violations against the occupied Palestinian people and yet we continue to support financially with billions of dollars coming from our tax dollars?
 
AUDIENCE:  Booo!

THE PRESIDENT:  Okay, now, everybody has got to be courteous, everybody is answering the question.

Let me just talk about the Middle East generally.  Look — all right, everybody, come on, come on, hold on.  Hold on one second, I’ve got to answer my question first, sir.  Okay.  I know you got — what, you got some beads on — are those New Orleans beads?  Okay.

Look, look, look, the Middle East is obviously an issue that has plagued the region for centuries.  And it’s an issue that elicits a lot of passions, as you heard.

Here’s my view.  Israel is one of our strongest allies.  It has — (applause.)  Let me just play this out.  It is a vibrant democracy.  It shares links with us in all sorts of ways.  It is critical for us and I will never waver from ensuring Israel’s security and helping them secure themselves in what is a very hostile region.  (Applause.)  So I make no apologies for that.

What is also true is that the plight of the Palestinians is something that we have to pay attention to, because it is not good for our security and it is not good for Israel’s security if you’ve got millions of individuals who feel hopeless, who don’t have an opportunity to get an education or get a job or what have you.

Now, the history of there is long and I don’t have time to go through the grievances of both sides in the issue.  What I have said and what we did from the beginning when I came into office is to say we are seeking a two-state solution in which Israel and the Palestinians can live side by side in peace and security.  (Applause.)  In order to do that both sides are going to have to make compromises.  (Applause.)

As a first step, the Palestinians have to unequivocally renounce violence and recognize Israel.  (Applause.)  And Israel has to acknowledge legitimate grievances and interests of the Palestinians.  We know what a solution could look like in the region, but here’s the problem that we’re confronting right now, is that both in Israel and within the Palestinian Territories, the politics are difficult; they’re divided.  The Israel government came in based on the support of a lot of folks who don’t want to make a lot of concessions.  I think Prime Minister Netanyahu is actually making some effort to try to move a little bit further than his coalition wants him to go.  On the other hand, President Abbas of the Palestinian Authority, who I think genuinely wants peace, has to deal with Hamas, an organization that has not recognized Israel and has not disavowed violence.

And so we are working to try to strengthen the ability of both parties to sit down across the table and to begin serious negotiations.  And I think that it’s important when we’re talking about this issue to make sure that we don’t just knee-jerk, use language that is inflammatory or in some fashion discourages the possibility of negotiation.  We’ve got to recognize that both the Palestinian people and Israelis have legitimate aspirations and they can be best served if the United States is helping them understand each other, as opposed to demonizing each other.

The transcript of the full 1+ hour town hall below the fold. More >>


Notes for Israel advocates: Negativity


A colleague in the Israel advocacy field (on the right from me…far right) complained that negativity about Israel will drive young Jews away from caring about Israel. Meaning progressive Israel advocacy is bad for Jews, bad for the Jewish state.

Dude, the negativity is already there! The news is full of negative stuff regarding Israel — just open up Ynet or Haaretz or the Forward or even NY Jewish Week. Watch the Daily Show or NBC News or CNN. And the pro-Israel “education” reportage is PR fluff — fake smiley faces tacked up with predetermined agendas, transparent as the eye can see. Wishing the negativity away makes the existing pro-Israel groups look out of touch.

Any Israel advocate worth their weight in salt will not bother with this outdated and failing mode of outreach. All the outreach today has been saccharine sweetness. And young Jews are still walking away. Worse, it’s their number one complaint getting out the door. Savory and salty is needed in this mix.

The moral of the story is “be human.” If Israel pisses you off, own it. Don’t hide behind a laughable belief that a critical word from you, a Jew, will dismantle the Jewish state. If you as a pro-Israel advocate “seig heil” everything Israel does, you show that you’re not human, you’re an automaton. And no young person aspires to be an automaton. Be human, folks. Israel is a state, not a god.


“With God on Our Side”: Christian progressives tackle Christian Zionists


Awesomeness. With Jewish progressives tackling the right-wing in our own camp, it is high time progressive folks in the Christian community stopped targeting Jews for outreach and went after their own flock. Check it out: www.withgodonourside.com.


How to kill non-Jews — now available at a bookstore near you


The Kings Torah in a Pomeranz bookstore in Israel, photo courtesy of The Forward

As reported by The Forward:

Rabbi Zalman Nechemia Goldberg, one of Israel’s most respected rabbinic commentators, initially endorsed the book, but rescinded his approval a month after its release, saying that the book includes statements that “have no place in human intelligence.”

Shlomo Aviner, chief rabbi of Beit El and head of Yeshivat Ateret Yerushalayim, said he had “no patience” to read the book, and spoke out against it to his students.

More denouncements, please?


Erev Hadash TV interview: Breaking the Silence supporter creams Im Tirtzu sloganeer


Rami Hoyberger debating the Im Tirtzu supporter here is like sandblasting a Saltine. Rami Hoyberger is an Israeli actor who’s signed onto the Rabbis for Human Rights petition for an independent investigation into the Cast Lead war in Gaza, as suggested is necessary by testimonies collected by Breaking the Silence.

Im Tirtzu is a self-declared centrist (ha) Zionist campus group in Israel that fights, of all things, “Repressed Post-Zionism” in Israeli discourse and society. Their name is means “If you will it” from the Hebrew slogan of Zionist philsopher Theodore Herzl “If you will it, it is no dream.” They seem to have a vague definition of post-Zionism and Zionism and appear to oppose a Zionism that is not Judeo-supremacist. Shame then that they have such nice t-shirts.


What the Israeli Embassy replied about Women of the Wall


I sent the Israeli Embassy an email provided to me by NIF and the Religious Action Center of the Reform movement, supporting the Women of the Wall’s call for gender equality at the Kotel/Western Wall. This is their reply. Pfft.

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: IsraelEmb DC
Date: Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 1:54 PM
Subject: RE: In favor of Women at the Wall
To: KFJ

Thank you for writing to the Embassy of Israel.

The State of Israel affirms its commitment to upholding its democratic and pluralistic values and to ensuring freedom of religion on a daily basis. In this spirit, Israel’s High Court of Justice ruled on April 6, 2003, that space adjacent to the Western Wall should be specifically designated for the conduct of religious services that do not conform to long-established practice at the area known as the Kotel. In light of this ruling, the site or Robinson’s Arch, which adjoins the Western Wall and is along the same retaining wall of the Temple Mount above, was designated to host egalitarian services that encourage both men and women to wear tallit and read from the Torah.

While this arrangement does not fully satisfy each and every person’s demands, the profound sensitivity of the matter has made compromise an imperative. The current situation provides all Jews with an outlet for religious expression next to Judaism’s most sacred site.

It is vitally important to Israel that the status of the Western Wall be preserved as an iconic symbol of the Jewish people. As in any law-abiding country, violating the stipulations of the Court’s ruling constitutes an offence that is subject to law enforcement. In full accordance with the instruction of the High Court, we will continue to guarantee that all Jews are afforded the opportunity to assemble and pray in its vicinity.

Sincerely,
Office of Public Affairs
Embassy of Israel


Shomrim mobile HQ copies NYPD motif


Spotted in my hood of Crown Heights while buying kosher meat. Is that even legal?
Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®